| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
761. Corporate roles issue.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Virgil Travis wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: Virgil Travis wrote: Corp roles are an utter mess, I had a bug a couple of months back with members who had recently joined appearing multiple times in the members list. I'm looking forward to t...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.16 11:45:00
|
762. Corporate roles issue.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Virgil Travis wrote: Corp roles are an utter mess, I had a bug a couple of months back with members who had recently joined appearing multiple times in the members list. I'm looking forward to them (hopefully) revamping the whole thing and maki...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.16 11:33:00
|
763. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wow, 28 pages and still the only thing that's clear is how much you lot like to wave your e-peens around. So after all this time, wasted words and pointless too and fro, have you lot decided how CCP should operate their own business yet? Or have y...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.16 11:20:00
|
764. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: Look at the bit I highlighted, now look back at your own comment, now back to the bit I highlighted, now back to your comment. Do you see what I did there? Yes. You ignored the GM quote. My point is ...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.15 18:28:00
|
765. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cutout Man wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: Well, I found the last meaningful GM correspondence GM Homonoia wrote: Ok, this seems to be getting out of hand and our rulings are pulled out of context. So let me state this in the most simple...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.15 18:12:00
|
766. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, I found the last meaningful GM correspondence GM Homonoia wrote: Ok, this seems to be getting out of hand and our rulings are pulled out of context. So let me state this in the most simple terms possible. 1. New PLAYERS are protected ...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.15 17:37:00
|
767. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So when was the last GM correspondence in this thread?
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.15 17:32:00
|
768. [MERC] COLD HAND OF SHADOW ALLIANCE - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Just a word of advice, but I would remove the word harassment from your advert, as that is a bannable offence
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 20:17:00
|
769. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: GM Homonoia wrote: RubyPorto wrote: b) continue short list of Exceptions, like initiating a suicide gank, or whatever. Take these from the publicly viewable information used in your in house Newbie definition That ri...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 20:07:00
|
770. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well, this got out of hand pretty quickly. I am forced to wonder why this has become such a massive issue, most of the people in this thread screaming "We need clarification about what a Rookie is" can't really be all that bothered about it, if t...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 20:03:00
|
771. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: Please explain, in detail, how you believe this is the case. If it is made absolutely and in every way illegal to attack rookies, then anyone with any kinds of brains will keep creating rookies for any f...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 18:34:00
|
772. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: None of this would be an issue if people weren't pathetic enough to go shoot at rookies in the first place. GǪexcept that you have to be able to do so, otherwise it would create such a ridiculously huge...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 16:32:00
|
773. CCP - Rookie System Rules Clarification - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
None of this would be an issue if people weren't pathetic enough to go shoot at rookies in the first place.
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 16:17:00
|
774. Suggestions to increase EVE player base. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arkanus Shun wrote: Flakey Foont wrote: Look bub, the game is slow and hard for a reason. It weeds out the pseudo types who want it all now. Every game does not have to please you. And don't start with the "I know how to get more people" cra...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 00:23:00
|
775. Suggestions to increase EVE player base. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Arkanus Shun wrote: 1) First the game has almost no variety in station styles. Going from one sector to the next I see the exact same station style everywhere. It is great that there are alot of standard functions within these stations but the ...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.14 00:08:00
|
776. exactly when is someone not "a Rookie"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
THE L0CK wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: To the bottom of the forums, with a lovely lock. /blush *hugs THE LOCK* Here, have a cookie... *gives cookie*
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.13 22:29:00
|
777. exactly when is someone not "a Rookie"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Morganta wrote: Cutter Isaacson wrote: This thread is going somewhere. To the bottom of the forums, with a lovely lock. only after some ISD removes the excessive lines from your post The excessive lines in my post contai...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.13 21:40:00
|
778. exactly when is someone not "a Rookie"? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This thread is going somewhere. To the bottom of the forums, with a lovely lock.
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.13 21:36:00
|
779. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
THE L0CK wrote: Well it looks like we may be coming to the end of thread with the personal attacks and mudslinging now so I just wanted to say Thank you, 5 stars, was a great read and will read again. Hey, it took 15 pages to get to that po...
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.13 15:52:00
|
780. Crimes for Unposted Policies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gatosai wrote: socratic...is that you? XD Who?
- by Cutter Isaacson - at 2012.06.13 15:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |